vale la pena cambiare?

[Alberto_Santinello]

Ciao a tutti, risposto in MP ma metto qua la risposta che mi ha dato multiplex, che ha fatto chiarezza tra le seguenti riceventi:

Light, 1 antenna - no telemetria
Light, ma 2 antenne (DR) - no telemetria
Classiche DR con telemetria

e quelle nuove da 5 e 7 ( # 5 5817 e # 5 581) canali che arriveranno (1 antenna,però circuito di pre-amplificazione e telemtria).
Qua sotto le risposte:

succo:
The new RX-5 M-LINK (# 5 5817) and RX-7 M-LINK (# 5 5818)
are for the following typical applications:
• Gliders and electric gliders with wingspans up to about 2.50 m
• Small to medium-sized model helicopters, up to a rotor diameter of about 1 m
• Electric and glow-powered models with wingspans up to about 1.60 m
• RC model cars
• RC model boats.

They are fitted with ONLY ONE receiver circuit (in contrast to the RX-7-DR M-LINK ==> DR = Dual Receiver). But the new receivers are fitted with a supplementary signal pre-amplifier (as in RX-7-DR M-LINK).

So these new receivers should be used for the "typical MULTIPLEX models", i.e. Mentor, Cularis, EasyGlider, ...

Additionally they provide telemetry functions (in opposite to the M-LINK "light" receivers).

Due to the two receivers built in, the RX-7-DR M-LINK (with two receivers and two antennas) will have a better reception compared to the new RX-5 M-LINK or RX-7 M-LINK (only ONE receiver built in and only ONE antenna).

This is the reason, why we suggest to use the two new receivers in smaller models and the RX-7-DR M-LINK in bigger models.

Please don´t use the two new receivers in F3B or F3J models.
Please use a RX-7-DR M-LINK for these models (DR = Dual Receiver).

Remark:
The RX-6-DR light M-LINK receiver is fitted with two receivers, but not with the supplementary signal pre-amplifier.

Un saluto a tutti
Alberto